Enea SA’s Management Board’s intention is to apply all the principles of the corporate governance. Due to the fact however, that some principles may pose the necessity to incur excessive burdens by the Company which could exceed potential benefits resulting from market needs, in 2017 the Company waived the application of some principles and recommendations of the corporate governance indicated below.
I. Management Board and Supervisory Board
II.Z.3. At least two supervisory board members meet the independence criteria referred to in rule II.Z.4.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that pursuant to Enea SA’s Statute the independence criteria should be met by at least one member of the Supervisory Board. Hence, the Company’s Statute does not secure the compliance with the rule in question. However, the Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.
II.Z.5. A supervisory board member submits to the remaining members of the supervisory board and to the company’s management board a statement that he/she meets the criteria of independence set out in rule II.Z.4.
The Company’s comment:The Company would like to explain that pursuant to the Company’s Statute, an independent member of the Supervisory Board is obliged to make a written statement to the Company about meeting all the criteria of independence – together with an obligation to immediately inform the Company whenever he/she ceases to meet such criteria. However, the Statute of Enea SA does not provide for a duty to make such statements to the remaining members of the Supervisory Board. However, the Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.
II.Z.7. As regards the tasks and operation of the committees operating in the supervisory board, the provisions of Annex I to the European Commission Recommendation referred to in rule II.Z.4 shall apply. In the case where the audit committee function is performed by the supervisory board, the above rules shall apply accordingly.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that with respect to the tasks and operation of the committees operating in the Supervisory Board, it applies the provisions of Annex I to the European Commission Recommendation referred to in the rule under analysis, with a proviso that the Company’s internal instruments do not require the majority of members of these committees to meet the independence criteria. The Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.
II.Z.8. Chairman of the audit committee meets the independence criteria set out in rule II.Z.4.
The Company’s comment:The Company would like to explain that pursuant to the Supervisory Board Regulations in effect at the Company, at least one member of the Audit Committee should be an independent member. However, the Company’s internal documents do not stipulate that this requirements must be met by the chairperson of such committee. In the light of the provisions of the abovementioned Regulations, the committee members choose the chairperson from among themselves. The Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.
IV. General Meeting and shareholder relations
IV. R.2. If this is justified due to the shareholding structure or due to the shareholders’ expectations communicated to the company, as long as the company is able to ensure the technical infrastructure necessary for the efficient conducting of the general meeting with the use of electronic communication means, the company should enable its shareholders to participate in the general meeting with the use of such means, in particular through: 1) real-time transmission of the general meeting sessions, 2) two-way real-time communication where the shareholders can communicate in the course of the general meeting session while staying in a location other than the place of the general meeting session, 3) exercising, either personally or via a proxy, the voting rights at the general meeting.
The Company’s comment:The Company would like to explain that the Company’s Statute does not provide for the option to participate in the General Meeting via electronic communication means. Notwithstanding the above, the Company’s Management Board generally has a positive approach to enabling the Company’s shareholders in the future to participate in the General Meeting with the use of the means ensuring real-time remote transmission of data, on condition that applicable legal regulations are adopted.
IV.Z.2. If this is justified due to the company’s shareholding structure, the company ensures the real-time transmission of the general meeting sessions available to the public.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that currently does not provide real-time transmission of the general meeting sessions. However, the image and sound recording of the general meeting sessions is each time made and it is subsequently rendered available by the Company via the corporate website.
V. Conflict of interest and transactions with related entities
V.Z.5. Before the conclusion by the company of a significant agreement with a shareholder holding at least 5% of the total number of votes in the company or a related entity, the management board shall request the supervisory board to grant a consent for such transaction. Before granting such consent, the supervisory board shall conduct the assessment of the impact of such transaction on the company’s interest. The above obligation shall not refer to conventional transactions concluded on an arm’s length basis as part of the operating activity carried on by the company with member entities of the company’s capital group. In the case where a decision on the conclusion by the company of a significant agreement with a related entity is made by the general meeting, the company, before making such decision, shall ensure for all shareholders the access to such information as may be necessary to conduct the assessment of the impact of such transaction on the company’s interest.
.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that pursuant to Enea SA’s Statute, the powers of the Supervisory Board include, without limitation, granting a consent for the conclusion of a significant agreement with a related entity, provided that in order to pass a binding resolution in this respect it is necessary that the majority of the Supervisory Board members meeting the independence criteria vote for passing such resolution. The terms “related entity” and “significant agreement” are defined pursuant to the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance on current and periodical information. However, the Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.
VI. Remuneration
VI.R.1. The remuneration of members of the company’s bodies and of the key managers should result from the remuneration policy adopted.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that no remuneration policy has been adopted at Enea SA.
VI.R.2. The remuneration policy should be closely related to the company’s strategy, its short- and long-term objectives, long-term interests, and results, and it should also take into account the solutions contributing to avoidance of discrimination on any grounds.
The Company’s comment:The Company would like to explain that no remuneration policy has been adopted at Enea SA. The Management Board declares to strive to ensure that the Company’s remunerating practice takes into account the circumstances mentioned in the content of the recommendation, as far as possible.
VI.R.3. . If the remuneration committee operates in the supervisory board, the scope of its operation shall be governed by rule II.Z.7.
The Company’s comment: The Company would like to explain that with respect to the tasks and operation of the committees operating in the Supervisory Board, it applies the provisions of Annex I to the European Commission Recommendation referred to in the rule under analysis, with a proviso that the Company’s internal instruments do not require the majority of members of these committees to meet the independence criteria. The Management Board declares that it considers the circumstances mentioned in the content of this rule as good corporate practice. Therefore, the Management Board declares that it may request the Company’s competent bodies to consider making adequate changes to the Company’s internal instruments with an adequate recommendation.